Posts Tagged ‘JBoss


Replacing Persistence Caching with In Memory DataGrids

Anyone that designed an enterprise system in Java with non-functional requirements that demanded tight response times faced the challenge of tuning the overall solution. If you are using Hibernate for persistence your first idea is to turn on Hibernate Caching but unfortunately it only Caches loads through Entity Id and sometimes you need to lookup through a secondary unique key. Another solution you might think is turning on Query Cache but as this post points out is more harmful to scalability and latency than you can ever imagine. Although Hibernate Docs and the post referenced above suggest that using @NaturalId annotation and Querying using Criteria API and a specially crafted Restriction through naturalId method would alleviate much of that problem it turns out that updates on related tables hugely undermines the improvements NaturalId queries may bring as this post suggest:

[…] Even though the objects are essentially static, the query cache takes the safe route and says any change to a related table invalidates any and all queries that reference that table. This makes sense, from a generic cache standpoint. […]

Source: Hibernate: Cache Queries the Natural Id Way
Add to this the fact that second level hibernate caches are data caches, not object caches so even on the best case of a cache miss you’d still have the cost of hydrating the object (as it is called on Hibernate terminology).

Object Caching

So, after giving up on all those previous attempts you’ll start considering taking the next obvious path: using/implementing an Object Caching. Have you noticed that I mentioned implementing? Yes, implementing. Now you’ll probably have to take care of the loading process in the case of cache misses, in fact you’ll be using a pattern called Side Caching.
But this can become a tedious code for maintaining and very prone to errors not to mention that implementing asynchronous write-behind won’t be an easy task.

In Memory DataGrids

Fortunately newer solutions marketed as In Memory DataGrids (or IMDG for short) provide an almost automagic way of plugging specially crafted classes that would be responsible for querying the underlying persistent storage on Cache misses, not to mention that they also provide improved partitioning and a great amount of other facilities usually not available on regular caches.
WebSphere eXtreme Scale Loaders and JBoss InfiniSpan CacheStore are examples of such specially crafted extensions for IMDGs. Those APIs also allow for updating the underlying storage (even asynchronously) with the changes that were passed to the in memory cache. One thing still missing (on different extents) on both solutions is the ability of querying the underlying store using a natural key. On eXtreme Scale there is already a framework for loading JPA entities but it lacks the ability of querying the underlying storage by anything different than the Cache Key that in those cases defaults to Entity Id (eXtreme Scale Query API is capable of querying the cache through any eXtreme Scale entity attribute but it only sees the data in memory). InfiniSpan on the other hand as of the 4.0.0 release does not provide anything similar to eXtreme Scale JPALoader or JPAEntityLoader it still sees the database (as on its JDBC Based CacheStore) as means of providing offloading and surviving reloads but never as means of querying data based on application defined format (eg.: application entities). Instead it uses its own format for storing data which limits its capability of loading from application storage in case of cache misses.

Querying IMDGs through Natural Keys

In summary, if you need to query through a natural key, in both cases you’ll need to roll your own Loader/CacheStore. And by querying through a natural key I mean something along the lines of what is described on Bill Burke’s EJB3 book:

The first way to define a primary-key class (and, for that matter, composite keys) is to use the @IdClass annotation. Your bean class
does not use this primary-key class internally, but it does use it to interact with the entity manager when finding a persisted object through
its primary key.
In your bean class, you designate one or more properties that make up your primary key, using the @Id annotation. These properties
must map exactly to properties in the @IdClass.

This way you can query the Cache using something in the lines of:

MyObjectNaturalKey key = new MyObjectNaturalKey("keyField1", "keyField2");
MyObject o = (MyObject) cache.get(key);

And you’ll have the guarantee that if this object exists either already on memory or in JPA EntityManager it’ll be returned.

Implementing a InfiniSpan CacheStore

Infinispan’s CacheStore interface has the following methods:

package org.infinispan.loaders;
public interface CacheStore extends CacheLoader {
   void store(InternalCacheEntry entry) throws CacheLoaderException;
   void fromStream(ObjectInput inputStream) throws CacheLoaderException;
   void toStream(ObjectOutput outputStream) throws CacheLoaderException;
   void clear() throws CacheLoaderException;
   boolean remove(Object key) throws CacheLoaderException;
   void removeAll(Set<Object> keys) throws CacheLoaderException;
   void purgeExpired() throws CacheLoaderException;
   void prepare(List<? extends Modification> modifications, GlobalTransaction tx, boolean isOnePhase) throws CacheLoaderException;
   void commit(GlobalTransaction tx) throws CacheLoaderException;
   void rollback(GlobalTransaction tx);
   public CacheStoreConfig getCacheStoreConfig();

If you need further explanation of what each method does, see its JavaDoc. InfiniSpan team suggests having a look on DummyInMemoryCacheStore in order to have a general idea of how should a CacheStore be implemented but still I have the feeling it misses an explanation of how InternalCacheEntries should be instantiated and in fact there is a factory class for it.
At last, if you need further information JBoss InfiniSpan Wiki has an overview of the builtin CacheStore classes.

Implementing an eXtreme Scale Loader

eXtreme Scale has plenty information on how to write a Loader as well. InfoCenter has two important pages: the first one presents a general overview on how to write a loader, the second one presents one important concept of eXtreme Scale: its tuples. If you implement a Loader that stores its data based on tuples you are free from having to have the stored classes (in case of custom application classes) in the same classloader as the container process.
WebSphere eXtreme Scale Wiki has a page dedicated to explaining how to write a Loader which presents the signature of a class that implements the Loader interface:

public interface Loader {
    static final SpecialValue KEY_NOT_FOUND;
    List get(TxID txid, List keyList, boolean forUpdate) throws LoaderException;
    void batchUpdate(TxID txid, LogSequence sequence) throws LoaderException, OptimisticCollisionException;
    void preloadMap(Session session, BackingMap backingMap) throws LoaderException;

Apart from the Wiki there’s a post on Billy New Port’s DevWebSphere blog
that has the source code available for what he calls the PureQuery Loader for eXtreme Scale. It is a loader capable of loading POJOs from SQL queries.
Finally if you need a starting guide for eXtreme Scale, have a look at ObjectGrid programming model guide and samples that although slighlty old is still a good starting guide for WebSphere eXtreme Scale.
Lastly I’d like to say that Packt Publishing book on eXtreme Scale is also a good reference for it.


Designing Glassbox Tests and Failure focused Tests using Byteman

There is one thing that always intrigued me, the absence of tools that supported the design of GlassBox tests and tests that focused on failure scenarios up to the point that I ever thought about starting my own open source project but recently I stumbled upon Byteman project from JBoss.
The project description on the project site states that Byteman is:

Byteman is a bytecode injection tool which simplifies development of tests for Java applications using a technique called fault injection. Byteman works by inserting scripted side effects into application code, Test scripts may include actions which create and propagate conditions appropriate to the test scenario. Or they may simply verify correct execution of the application program.

Byteman has a good list of pros:

  • Powerful Scripting Language
  • Possibility of adding and updating the Scripts for code modification at runtime
  • Simple Java class for uploading scripts to a running JVM which makes it easy for integrating script updates into a JUnit test

I started to test the tool today and I can say that the first impression was incredible. I agree that the scripting syntax may improve a little (eg.: every rule has to have an IF what forces you to use IF true sometimes) but this can’t be considered an impeditive problem.
I’ll try to post here some examples of its usage.


Quartz Resource Adapter as an alternative to EJB Timers

Anyone developing a J2EE application probably faced the challenge of setting some fixed interval timers that need to be up upon application startup. This, in fact involves two challenges:

First one: J2EE provides no means of startup notification on EJB-Jars.

Second: EJB timers are persistent (they survive server restarts) and if you don’t cancel them upon application shutdown you’ll end up having lots of those timers.

So, wouldn’t it be fine if we had some mechanism of having a notification sent down from AppServer to our application in a timed manner? It’d be even better if we had some mechanism to specify the intervals using Unix Cron format.

Happily there is a simple solution: Quartz Resource Adapter from JBoss licensed as LGPL (as stated on its ra.xml) that makes it safely usable on commercial products. It comes packaged as a rar file on JBoss deploy directory as it seems to be used for JBoss internal purposes but nothing (or almost nothing) prevents you from using it into another AppServer.

By almost nothing I meant that as it is packaged on JBoss there is one quirk:

QuartzResourceAdapter.endpointActivation method does one trick to detect whether the endpoint configured is a stateless or stateful endpoint that renders it unusable on WebSphere for example (WebSphere prevents you from calling MessageEndpointFactory.createEndpoint from the Thread that invoked endpointActivation) and I am sincerely not sure whether this is something the spec enforces. I’ll paste the trick below:

 // allocate instance of endpoint to figure out its endpoint interface
      Class clazz = QuartzJob.class;
      MessageEndpoint tmpMe = endpointFactory.createEndpoint(null);
      if (tmpMe instanceof StatefulJob) clazz = StatefulQuartzJob.class;

And the best thing is that this trick can be safely replaced by two markup ActivationSpec classes, so we end up having the following code:

      // figure out endpoint interface through activationspec (WAS denies endpoint creation on main thread)
      Class clazz = null;
      if (spec instanceof QuartzStatelessActivationSpec) {
          clazz = QuartzJob.class;
      else {
          clazz = StatefulQuartzJob.class;

And the two markup classes:

package org.jboss.resource.adapter.quartz.inflow;

public class QuartzStatefulActivationSpec extends QuartzActivationSpec {

package org.jboss.resource.adapter.quartz.inflow;

public class QuartzStatelessActivationSpec extends QuartzActivationSpec {


And the ra.xml file for the RAR package gets changed from:




Apart from this you’ll have to include jboss-common.jar (found on $JBOSS_HOME\lib) into the quartz-ra.rar file in the same level as quartz-ra.jar and quartz.jar.
Now you are done to install it into your application server and finally create your Activation Specs.
I am providing a PDF with Patched Quartz Resource Adapter for anyone willing to test on your preferred J2EE server and I also posted a message on JBoss AS Development forum to check whether they are interested in incorporating these changes.
Updates: It seems like this is going to get integrated into JBoss AS main code. I’ve submitted the patch as requested.


WebSphere custom user repository

If you already used JBoss you probably used (or at least knew there is) the DatabaseServerLoginModule. But, if you happen to be using WebSphere things are a little bit different. WebSphere (I guess version 6 onwards) comes with the powerful concept of the federated repository. This feature allows multiples sources for authentication and authorization. The final layout inside WebSphere ressembles an LDAP tree, every Repository is suffixed with an identifier.

But, unfortunately, through the Web Administration interface you are limited to LDAP and the builtin FileBased WIM authentication.

Another thing that makes it even harder is that there isn’t much documentation about these extended repositories.

There is one post from IBM that suggests that there are alternatives:

The information used for the registry lookup is customizable and can be made totally flexible if a custom registry is developed using the WebSphere Application Server custom registry interface.

But still there isn’t a single link from this article that points out how to achieve this. If you get the key words in this phrase and risk a Google search you’d end up finding how to do this on WebSphere 4, that, by the way, was much limitted when compared to what is available on WebSphere 6.

Refining this search a little bit you’ll find what you are looking for, how to do this on WebSphere 6. But you’ll only take this approach if you are willing to roll your own adapter, but be advised that this tutorial won’t cover every steps you need and this is the content of another post. There is a complex interface that needs to be implemented in order to fulfill the requirements of an WebSphere Repository. The complexity is derived from the fact that all method in this interface is based on commonj.sdo.DataObject class and this class maps an XML to a Java Object hierarchy making for now this implementation almost a guessing game since there isn't much public information regarding this interface contract.

But, returning to the original objective of the post that was to guide on how to make WebSphere authenticate users against a database, setup the DBAdapter using the guide that is found on this page. If you want, check the list of WebSphere builtin adapters here.

The last step is to create the tables for the database as described on step 3 of this post. This post in fact describes various possibilities for user repositories available in WebSphere.

JBoss DatabaseServerLoginModule adantages over WebSphere approach are its simplicity and flexibility but on the other hand, WebSphere Federated Repositories present a much more robust approach for handling user databases.

I’ll try to post some tips on how to roll your own Repository in the next few days.


Blog Stats

  • 353,165 hits since aug'08

%d bloggers like this: